Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve Idle Timeout text (#3414)

Nick Banks <> Tue, 04 February 2020 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3202120144 for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuo5L5G0upLh for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84E21200B7 for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:10:35 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1580857836; bh=cmtFIDdLcEdfZd/ACKXcm2Orz7i7E7Zqw3VB+AsADgw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mXb5K8uCJ8IHIYzsxkB8TY4itcLWSEtLP6LH3Eoh8wLyJtsjoX0ARwGpf8A/J/k9S zcB6WONNTbuVP2tU6p/Yl144fqYrvSYeLyQe8VE6uoI/l/VDQs6zfLcXElXGkH1BDa Y63KDeoswH5nt6wKFsOyagpx4R2t/XqbdzqfZwvU=
From: Nick Banks <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3414/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve Idle Timeout text (#3414)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e39f9ebe9f5c_3fb03fbfbb6cd968102911"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:10:38 -0000

nibanks commented on this pull request.

> +other ack-eliciting frames to test for liveness before sending any data that
+cannot be retried safely.  Note that it is likely that only applications or
+application protocols will know what information can be retried.

I don't understand this "retried safely" concept. What is an example of something unsafe to be retried?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: