Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MinRTT for the congestion control context (#2919)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sun, 21 July 2019 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA6612014F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtDazgVnwH3Y for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD3C120098 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:44:35 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1563745475; bh=S0ldVla22YaKk4eQanzRCRjnNEpoPbfZ6rnh01Y2pvI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bB84LOb0dSnkJ0gZgQ3Q8li8+3godmS8fhqU6cbffXpFY+7QMv4Kt0dJrDF5tTHne vxqs4r/wTct5HLQ0NNVoxv87OZVoXAdc6bxXgtT91g/9s6EJ41WOMx1ZMAV9J5ZOSl YVPoiRYZFM1ldJtABIW/RS7jgbkfSgAFicvQ+2fA=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7IGXPV656XS5RXF653IIHUHEVBNHHBYEA2AU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2919/review/264555725@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2919@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2919@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MinRTT for the congestion control context (#2919)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d34dcc3babbc_38cd3fb6cd6cd96480275"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/bmDRZcexvmUtFrkbwvO2YecLv50>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 21:44:38 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



>  following three values: the minimum value observed over the lifetime of the
-connection (min_rtt), an exponentially-weighted moving average (smoothed_rtt),
-and the variance in the observed RTT samples (rttvar).
+congestion control context (min_rtt), an exponentially-weighted moving average

We never define this, but isn't the RTT estimator a subset of the congestion control context?  Also, we only use RTT estimator once in this document at the moment.

Possibly I should use path for all of these now, against @erickinnear suggestion?  Also, path is much shorter than "congestion control context"

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2919#discussion_r305637430