Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix to ECN section regarding validation (#2113)

MikkelFJ <> Wed, 12 December 2018 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2668912F1A6 for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:43:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JIMNd2dAG24p for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D2712777C for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:43:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1544611436; bh=5zYW9TarABsWcf9O5AqJkmajtnPz8y5cYfRLd2MXjdE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xoQ+J85K8w/PAMm6ZTOjXGSfwWP1lMya76Lc6hieQNNJfK4cAL09z9SOmWLCPOTPG oMcMm0Dug9XeeWgG+muxm2SRQWw1ulDQdN2aeJvJscwAFBWxrWbEFCjfocCrnph8dL FS6hAam8xSHPzX7QvQ4OKAlIyjHqZUwAxh51yjb8=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2113/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix to ECN section regarding validation (#2113)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c10e66c32fba_18d43fbb002d45c4135616"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:43:59 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

>    Not-ECT.
 If a sender receives an ACK that contains no new acknowledgments, for example
 due to reordering of the ACKs, then ECN counter comparison SHOULD NOT be
-performed. Also if sender do not have state to determine if a particular PSN
-is newly acknowledge or not, then the comparison SHOULD NOT be performed.
+performed. If the sender does not have state to determine if a particular PSN
+is newly acknowledged or not, then the comparison SHOULD NOT be performed.

Please explain PSN - is it Packet Serial Number? In that case "packet", "packet number", or "PN" is more aligned with the rest of the text, I suppose.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: