Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restore other state after a spoofed migration (#3229)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 12 November 2019 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D554C120127 for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAiqXnv7crKg for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772D512011D for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBC06A1227 for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1573595202; bh=6gZIyyRfPEpTYlY3YqCbSrXBTCG6VVBVj9iGSNzza7c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VmYbRe3Fd9SaDJsof6Xgjb2wZAiGW8IuJlT59txEOmLyBIK+W2tSbMpgiZpj6Yn++ yjMZOR0nmEEs6hBk3Yb/8eoOli1o2V0VCfSdt79M3GcBAJLw+rupm81/50GgzYxwVm JB7amSzNct9A3CRZG+8DGcylPGRF6exFrPUFXh4c=
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:42 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3229/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restore other state after a spoofed migration (#3229)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dcb28429dfcb_50e23fae2a6cd9601561238"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:46:45 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.

> @@ -1979,7 +1979,10 @@ to verify the peer's ownership of the unvalidated address.
 An endpoint MAY send data to an unvalidated peer address, but it MUST protect
 against potential attacks as described in {{address-spoofing}} and
 {{on-path-spoofing}}.  An endpoint MAY skip validation of a peer address if that
-address has been seen recently.
+address has been seen recently.  In particular, if an endpoint returns to a
+previously-validated path after detecting some form of spurious migration,
+skipping address validation and restoring loss detection and congestion state
+can reduce the performance impact of the attack.

Yeah, that's harder to write down, I think.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: