IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A1512704A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:51:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IepjBzCthK1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F261200C1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:51:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=monwplpiaoNiJEc46havvFg/hlw=; b=RcFdiusS7Yh8pzJT xUMfZtJ+8LD1zl1mrhLw4q5DCXLM+2jkAHd5/SNBtwnfOQJlvTgboRhYW5nAsRmb UTHR6YD+9XTuItZzv2Wdq9E/oAslP15UyMqBWmq80EgzYRE/Ih6ybTMXhkp47lLl 2FrTnL4g+VHYr1VQ5/7HBzdqIZc=
Received: by filter0188p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0188p1las1-16452-5A544A6A-3 2018-01-09 04:51:54.137981196 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id iKNO1WhgQzOpT7EcpzvuqQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 04:51:54.020 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 04:51:54 +0000
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcbe1bf2e030981af65fbd0e52ba8e6ed862cad5c92cf00000001166c0c6992a169ce10e7bb4d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1029/356179594@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1029@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1029@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a544a69e230d_108e3fdab64c2f2c24629"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1klop6ZEiS0KE4UaWvFq8ucznTDkkoQP63Sk NizHwRu1c9RiIVIzAb+PyzmOQb4BjNJ/ySM0okphRASDmi7bJGgiqjZhgWqc35QkrgYTFGT5mbwyWh IuDEO3WhSorhtP7xPjW7+DB9IAXc06SZBHF5+b/RdCsJ8M6NI0AgMiSby39zKscodAmPAWMOc5xeSc M=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/cAAddb8cFmEdopZlOpFzLvbGvuw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 04:51:57 -0000

@ianswett: Are you saying that you expect that many (most? all?) client and server implementations will not adhere to the spec regarding the drain periods? I see the point, since at the moment when a connection is over, there's no point in being a nice and spec-compliant peer any more.
If we think this is actually the case, I'm beginning to wonder what the whole point of specifying the drain period is.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1029#issuecomment-356179594

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status