Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header payload length 16bits (#1577)
Patrick McManus <notifications@github.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 12:04 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509C51294D7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4yH0dhpd40Ck for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7D5127332 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:03:59 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1532001839; bh=y6N8Kh3KnuKhYsoHdVHrgVSfCxpmUl7hUd/0NRFqKGA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=T6cUtKYy9I8421toT6JnvtKsyH8lEEGXI7egtE+TBeyn2iFjxHLuwp1/Esxt0yAeZ pzQ0wqDboWKtLKskmiGB6zWer2/gfTDK8MheA5FlEB6yjJlkLDPVCNiUcOYYiM8I0s RtgS8i3jh+xIC9TbCDL3R3m63R4ehtUwP4a+5ZW4=
From: Patrick McManus <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf21a1911c2e03d7273853cf5acec22a874ad822792cf000000011768402f92a169ce146220ed@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1577/406252621@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1577@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1577@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header payload length 16bits (#1577)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b507e2f43467_19e13ff31c6ccf6056597"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mcmanus
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/cCKIYtyMnuZzDiBKU-qf8BUy0fc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:04:04 -0000
I agree with ian and kazuho, the current "mostly standard" use of varint is better than big grab bag set of different sizes we had before On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:43 PM, ianswett <notifications@github.com> wrote: > I'd like to stick with the varint heavy design for QUIC v1. If it turns > out to be a pain in practice, let's reconsider for v2. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1577#issuecomment-406136809>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAP5s79wDMGBss4EJxQXokTYFcSpgs1Bks5uH_JEgaJpZM4VTFuj> > . > -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1577#issuecomment-406252621
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… MikkelFJ
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header … David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long hea… janaiyengar