Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN text disables ECN too aggressively (#2534)

Magnus Westerlund <> Wed, 22 May 2019 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A106120104 for <>; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.464
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNn3_FZan6l3 for <>; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D2D21200B1 for <>; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 02:02:08 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1558515728; bh=YDvbmsPWggpiCpruePwHR+iPVfoXMtEFrLUeFNzZtPY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gAU+7Pf03Eth5xgGoQq7u6FX+Yp6iynybGlHRVsy0uGAe+0aO7dsgovMjRU6VMIbK kPDNMTFBu5bR2xtVzojZdb2kCcirTLXuXAIdav6YwpGZYnCBa9f8H9ocfgfDwLF3gu zhdH6YZrKaBd3d6HOv/+yxyidcg+vYOv4jWmzZrI=
From: Magnus Westerlund <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2534/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN text disables ECN too aggressively (#2534)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce5101064eed_132d3fa273acd9601544383"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:02:11 -0000

So the intention here is that if you hit an ECN blackhole that you disable ECT marking the sent packet in a timely fashion to minimize the impact on connection establishment. And I don't think a single sender behavior is necessary. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: