Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-RTT is unclear (#2829)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 24 June 2019 04:11 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AC6120105 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uj2W3sk55hcm for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E3212008B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:11:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1561349477; bh=3oeZIDIdEmZqNQI//mYsENw1tzfznlBcRKOipEfvNGE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2OobhY4uGTPaNQ1l19eTC0WwBgCeKfm4k66KWza3wKXN7/DRQNJi2qB5vyVfsIbIQ oJYBCQ6NuCkQQ+xTxBh5ikgCWWhbgb6ZszKEIoKVgLMbNhr6bfxpOBZRPHHVUNvz6Z COKEguJmEg2abY3p+77UFvyAVB1z0vNQH73AIA6k=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYAWGAJAGWWZPK562V3DV76LEVBNHHBWYX3LA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2829/504850056@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2829@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2829@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-RTT is unclear (#2829)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d104d655a923_7c683f94250cd96c3069de"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/cMPBpeJjvxHhUdZFOyvpdqzPNCA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:11:21 -0000
> The QUIC equivalent would be to drop all packets of packet type 0-RTT. It is my understanding the existence of early_data extension in the EncryptedExtensions message indicates if the server has accepted 0-RTT (or not). Merely dropping the packets is not sufficient. This is because the parameters of a connection depends on if 0-RTT has been received; for example, in case of HTTP/3, until the client receives a SETTINGS frame, the settings of previous connection is applied when 0-RTT is accepted, whereas the default settings defined by the specification is applied when 0-RTT is rejected. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2829#issuecomment-504850056
- [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-RTT i… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-R… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-R… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-R… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] text about rejecting 0-R… Martin Thomson