Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extension frames (#1068)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F5D126B7E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 23:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C_rNufqDpClr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 23:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11B7124319 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 23:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=w/6e51kzcwt4U/mP2rU9fWh5y0M=; b=PwnBDM/n60BPFXWY D/nh/pGwW3VSGXCwRe4vRGA0dpgki0kzT+JidzfgMUsdwVk0usmdPqfe4NVaOTOC UPFxPE/fbjp3jPblmEmSqerFqcMoMLgBy5tIdqNGI1VCUGbRQMV4vpvUG6GLZvV/ D4DVxslu+ynLztqHsNc3xtWuDBw=
Received: by filter0425p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0425p1mdw1-27997-5ACB0A6F-8 2018-04-09 06:38:39.889386109 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) by ismtpd0043p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id sT36cygbTJCgAOVgggT5-Q for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:38:39.843 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:38:39 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab27860ccafd98663ed1c54259947367540408179092cf0000000116e2cc6f92a169ce115ea54e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068/c379649672@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extension frames (#1068)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acb0a6f96572_a4f3f88e0504f304289e0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak37lZPUwGuVA7jLlXjXmWIMp3o0xv9KiToSAS W63tbTffnQDyad3yrbIl1UAvzCllBBilHthJ2ePJNwNfioPgzEb2NEy7C1K+5slTSuI0ZGcF2QCwCv SRvr18fCpoSEcaDI0+4IwBhokYfzbebQDoiEf7R0uAP871QXGNljrj+3wQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/cVn4ovRmSvkVSmPBLK9frUuba7Q>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:38:42 -0000

I'm with @kazuho  here - I was almost about to suggest something similar.
The only thing I'm a bit tentative about is that you can imagine having some extensions getting quite popular which you want to use, but still include some less common extensions. This cannot be done with a single extension ID. On the ID I suggest a 128-bit uuid because it won't collide.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068#issuecomment-379649672