Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)

Mike Bishop <> Thu, 14 February 2019 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA316131215 for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:36:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kcq3wcLjPvwK for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5697A13120F for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:36:10 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550183770; bh=eit6QZjYtdqteW6O0mkYOUoyptq9I5Tlep8FqGkLlQM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Wghiq6RQ/2iQU39O5XIoBfqdfQZdaGv5AYMrWpSf1qz/BeIxa9NHaC4k3nmXXpEme JlY9wGwEXQe57DSyzJGeroKzC0aVvvdkaD2w4m7MoM8934XpDEwBtJbyY8rulALlrd qS/j7oguol5C0Ab63v2C/kt3jN72GExpvsL+4JDI=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2466/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c65ed5a6c1c7_2de23fba178d45bc8721e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 22:36:13 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.

> @@ -2631,7 +2641,10 @@ number 0.  Subsequent packets sent in the same packet number space MUST increase
 the packet number by at least one.
 0-RTT and 1-RTT data exist in the same packet number space to make loss recovery
-algorithms easier to implement between the two packet types.
+algorithms easier to implement between the two packet types.  However, a client
+MUST NOT continue sending 0-RTT packets after beginning to use 1-RTT packets.
+Servers MUST drop 0-RTT packets with greater packet numbers than the lowest
+packet number they have received in a 1-RTT packet.

Fair enough.  We can PV on this.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: