Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF70131222 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55M2beTuHdWx for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA32B130EB8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:12:43 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531930364; bh=ryclUhFroXtxQMO4VfdsM+1JkvD36GXcQFWGAvJMnWY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GRHO3C5dab7QIKDVnE5B2usvE1dL4sz6Ac48gchTq/rNz7BLQhcBXB/YgvwKCYvVv TuSOklrojGbtZNsXImBfPkVXAdE55EC89cl+ZZvmggDmA/YL4K3A+U3vn1gNAlchlH A0aEKswDdIFwRCB/pJsIG8pZl4mdJ877eHkWctjc=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3f2ade7b4e2633c4fcdf4e60932905e9b051f70692cf00000001176728fb92a169ce14638397@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579/405988079@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4f66fbf2520_fe43fd7ba4ccf58306267"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/cnMezNBcQGEmdNKfskgtnd_8qFM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:12:59 -0000
Could someone also explain what the harm would be to allow ACKs for 0-RTT packets to be sent at the Handshake encryption level? Because if we allowed that, the first UDP datagram from the server, could potentially acknowledge everything it has received from the client, 0-RTT included. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579#issuecomment-405988079
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Num… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham