IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)

Alexandre Ferrieux <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8A6120469 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2OYDK7yawx7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-16.smtp.github.com (out-16.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96979120467 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:58:14 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554753495; bh=28QnGgVa4WmDnnvJ0hN756PNLIrCJ6IQWD29IB1OQ3s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0WWTcIbFp+PFrjw/dZDqzuP75i7UZNUrWs9LJs0RSurTMqtVk66QgHZkq3L+mquK0 pG3D/qkYzZi3CA/mnagTa1NTmF85h6VHtZ7nwYYX+USvDTinfWwjW9I8W0VP1x4uPH ppINJ+Rf3Mkeal361UQjDQd0q2fX7Mbe58g9FsRM=
From: Alexandre Ferrieux <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9b89febad14c49fb92dd051ce815746dc004532692cf0000000118c369d692a169ce19aaba39@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594/c480983638@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5caba7d6d7ee8_55803fd4bfed45bc5862"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ferrieux
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/co1LI2VYlkOO9dTl9B_tA0rvxjk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:58:18 -0000

> @ferrieux: This draft is an individual draft and not a wg document. A couple of suggestions:
> 
> 1. This is a repo for documents that are adopted by the QUIC wg, not for individual drafts. Use the internet drafts repository to post new individual drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/
> 2. The draft should be renamed to reflect that it's not a wg document. See Section 7 of https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/guidelines/ for more, but I would recommend renaming it to draft-ferriux-hamchaoui-quic-lossbits-exp.

Unless I'm mistaken, the spin bit draft started its life in this exact place. The reasoning being similar (a proposed extension to the main drafts, without preconceptions about where it should eventually land), I assumed it would be fine to do the same. Why is different ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594#issuecomment-480983638

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email