Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of RTT of QUIC flows (#631)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 19 June 2017 04:06 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E801273E2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vyOu_KbM2AJL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98942124C27 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:06:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1497845198; bh=3A58TTkGWWxWL6or+kw1DRZ2oSt3NHFzFKp4L3iXhzU=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Lcw4SX8CdlIx5GTTtNlE9EWmqmU3YCNBkdpayvfO/BwRqSKSrtBEIf+Er8gzuoPrD +L3zArn1qozmY5VtXdLu+o2WjyRARW6/HaMlhUBSrZI9d2RVtPbcaHhZPNQxDmpLiR xXZWR1Rrr5PnJ/53wZf6yrkBvEkI5Bmr9CTbJTfM=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab08a7e3a91b1521b12354c606c480d5e8efb7e4fa92cf00000001155f0fce92a169ce0e0f8270@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/631/309333858@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/631@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/631@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of RTT of QUIC flows (#631)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59474dcee805c_42553fc1ee449c3433560"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ctLjbmheZ4UBXWx-lI2T4N-o5lc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:06:41 -0000
Why do you say that the flip bit needs to be exempt from greasing? It's not like the intermediary is unable to reverse the greased transform as proposed. If greasing == encryption then that would be a whole different story of course. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/631#issuecomment-309333858
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… janaiyengar