Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 September 2017 14:12 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEC7133070 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKBAXdiKYCui for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D381132A89 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=mcXqhzR/IVb4+e/XhIz856HiRIE=; b=rN4nYpM8id9gk5Qg PX03eD6cuwU6qoiUj2nyX5bRvoT1XgYaWBFnv69djSIk8OsDuvSiY+m6oclK7pgj sg2vNV6Ml/N9IGRQXCtGL/E3apeXeSLbKgwqwArYLv3sICaS4Kl4ZHzD0ev0WFzR aYPT30aa1HH9Y4f397a0LCgvEPE=
Received: by filter0987p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0987p1mdw1-32737-59CA6043-34 2017-09-26 14:12:19.413363641 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0024p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id tILuB6Y9RLipct_8PLEuEA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:12:19.428 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:12:19 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba605aedef314e81ce744ca2618399e6e602667eb92cf0000000115e2224092a169ce0f3d8f2a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763/332211223@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59ca60406af04_2580b3f94f24f0f80958bc"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2BUWXnyPEPmdX/p+fh6kqD+fRRMIWUeLWJHF Ay0CytxgX4Boh/WZvbH/NUmYiC/FtEX1M/8RzH7Ne0KBcEuQv/gpKUehngMJZu1T8OLJZrgfsPzSDt yyL95nm/6mN4gUN/Ek5+yLXLI69aTMZqC+s1Ngt9vk4gT8eVVeBj5VStXdwIddWfumtnU9JEadSxgz w=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/d1HQlu2GGgLtor7oyYIV3dnNeu0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:12:21 -0000
Yes, 'retransmit' has some pretty strong associations from TCP, so we should probably avoid using it whenever possible. Resend might be an alternate option? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/763#issuecomment-332211223
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only "frames" (#763) Mike Bishop