Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ClientInitial is special (#627)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A3B13177A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6YnmjCC6K3z for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45E8131774 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=fy+KSlk5f52lAIq9ZLdT3oPBAlY=; b=mG3Jfi+JYYg1S6hR NYAKR/Wxtd072gJHCm/QLvIQ2BSqhwHmwtoki/khNh28iSDEU8+vZsO7tpBpWySs PJ3i+UfY0W4dTLkVkAZdKScDrL7ctmATz82du8C14YlUDQ9v2zkFfoN8DORcbuDt orK8db0lrbgZeRjO4F9ySq5Ckt0=
Received: by filter0556p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0556p1mdw1-27614-593FD30A-26 2017-06-13 11:56:58.717393632 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0001p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id mKcPGVrFSmq_q8uWcXRVgg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:56:58.630 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:56:58 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abde5ba3ae95839dd3b5a9c3db74ad92603a6ed13c92cf000000011557950a92a169ce0e090b03@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627/308093085@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ClientInitial is special (#627)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_593fd30a844fc_cfb33fefc1927c3c3903c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak07x+t/u2Be41uASdPZMI5Mb/G7PAPn3M/5jw 6TJOrH8xgxG6pJcE9lgjukQDOgqIV0NXtDr3auB3/zrQvSaZccjE5uMjJHObbNdWDvQEwilFPOJztG qjFDryUzjDj+mw729ny0ptb6NsGphdYDtCH9Gpw9zvyEtcpFo6fB+Z2lhKXTSu5ILOczZYI0z3Eb/z I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/d8R6Lrtyzm3e6gjJk5NLkdnydSE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:57:01 -0000

Is that necessarily so, given stateless retry? And key phase must be handled anyway. I don't want to add complexity though. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627#issuecomment-308093085