Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be better as empty transport parameters (#116)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Sat, 14 January 2017 02:19 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E52129641 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yzv2kBPCkBrn for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE54B12962C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:19:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=HcgNzEUj5B10If8ZJuOookewVZA=; b=f0Hf9FxTH5+3/Yb1 r4T6inbRhLSwyqX9hm5RcA9/Ut7Ks0TncH/TafYcj74ZBRl1O7JHMmygXrAJt/mX aPmOTqAmqe/+EOA+UVFxnlYCji7TfuPku8vFa/U/jE5u6sTWGpBVOXoVHcP3jemy X3Q5c8XpOg6ihFzDzxaEr5DkPnY=
Received: by filter0483p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0483p1mdw1-1825-58798AB4-1A 2017-01-14 02:19:32.400146191 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0001p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id ikcbhrqnTrS0GI6vrIB-VA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:19:32.336 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:19:32 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/116/272594335@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/116@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/116@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be better as empty transport parameters (#116)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58798ab43b847_39303f9b84767140158779"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak10UfSX4ZkWQ55RX39RLvStT/RyM5cJu09Uw0 S3iJE8xpr9xLfimYVazWcNGvcEuZqcD9ZFxz2syIPQXPrZiF1XClvPpiYUK+oip912hc/cxpJIMwd0 qt0V78VdY78Rj/dRrA5fxJuWGiuoZmdIgfROSS6FK+SDyIckANhbQynQjKwKq3fq12zzUywoN3FxVj Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dAk644rimoHQulTCaE6zWIlxBaQ>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:19:39 -0000
Per discussion with Jana, this isn't what it looks like. It's basically a tunnel for the client to relay opaque data from Chrome experiment configurations to the server, so the server can behave appropriate to the experiment on the given connection. I'm not sure opaque data relay is needed in the RFC in the first place. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/116#issuecomment-272594335
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be better as… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be bette… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be bette… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be bette… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be bette… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be bette… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Each COPT might be bette… Martin Thomson