Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK encoding requires two passes (#1138)
Hristo Venev <notifications@github.com> Thu, 21 June 2018 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB4A130EC5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J7N9x4BHowHo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64790130DFA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:51:04 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1529610664; bh=dkXJwMTsGWx3FzsE/0P56Rmo7PvZLIMqp1VTAbUG85E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=p1/KW5dxKL9yZVMQBj0vzjWvnL6tazSR3H4TwXKalDvZCxCSpeu+DF2ZLL0Uo0SI4 qdA5BNE3KNI3M/vOJRxZGA6fGPP7B0mxE1J8X0IPY2neeTscuaG5FlNbNADIT0CBMZ CJjtt6yjTyKlQcPConSE0CJCHLJF41OiWNeTKbis=
From: Hristo Venev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab87ecbd4702f65c7012b0c5bbe650eea079eb1c0192cf000000011743c3a892a169ce11dea75a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1138/399222163@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1138@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1138@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK encoding requires two passes (#1138)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b2c01a87907b_2d5a2aca09222f6053649"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: hvenev
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dJm4bZ0WGgUjDfXEfKkrKK7hGr4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:51:10 -0000
Does it make sense for the base index to be greater than the largest reference? Won't then all post-base references be illegal? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1138#issuecomment-399222163
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK encoding requires … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK encoding requires … Hristo Venev
- [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires two … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … krasic
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QCRAM encoding requires … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK encoding requires … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK encoding requires … Mike Bishop