[quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some examples (#1454)

afrind <notifications@github.com> Fri, 15 June 2018 22:01 UTC

Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:01:01 +0000
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd7dd96036eb069ba17d00185a340033e87c19baf92cf00000001173bf91c92a169ce13d80c39@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some examples (#1454)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b24371cab998_6ddb3fd58cdd4f7c1134dd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dam3xMdGfCec8C9snGXh2meeyE0>

>From an external researcher hoping to build an implementation: 

"The HPACK RFC authors made a wise choice to include several carefully crafted examples. I managed to create a HPACK implementation and to verify it using those examples. A similar list of examples could be considered for QPACK to make it easy to verify QPACK implementations. However, QPACK has some extra signaling, meaning constructing the examples list may not be as easy as it is for HPACK."

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lucas Pardue
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lucas Pardue
[quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some example… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Mike Bishop
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind