[quicwg/base-drafts] Exception for Retire Prior To (#3643)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09C23A0DE4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.173, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6IFz68XYdh0J for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AD73A0DE0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1ac52d7.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1ac52d7.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917E9282AAB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1589243831; bh=Ev7RpF9WbS0kI/bM8JN0o7giVCJegjxU3PfeJ0SJVFI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=v482ewj9Br6tiOk6haGoh63n/k95zI0Tfv1AOHcUI17v28sXORMoluLjOPZRzd6Lh NOli7DKSR6POyvDolBxfvq4FNNpmu1OSIbk4rrjea9OYEmYMjxjLFFKzzrdfmTR94E nnvtcepyD73q47+TGU6yVIpaOt5poHdpnW18tClg=
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:37:11 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4BEY336ZRZKPAZA4N4YXILPEVBNHHCJO45K4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3643@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Exception for Retire Prior To (#3643)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb9efb77df2b_7943fec8d8cd96c17074"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ddKhUaupT4zPtUFuXFhK4Lk_Z38>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 00:37:14 -0000

The rules for the active connection ID limit were such that the brief
bump that NEW_CONNECTION_ID + Retire Prior To could add was not
permitted.  Strictly speaking, if you requested retirement, the
connection IDs that you requested be retired are still active until you
receive a RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frame.  That means that you were
technically violating this MUST in the spec.  Adding an exception for
this case was the best way I could see to fix this.

The other was to change the definition of &quot;active connection ID&quot;.  I
tried that and, while it was a smaller change, it made the definition
less crisp.  This approach seems best.

(This is not new normative requirements as this is already [in the spec](https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.html#section-5.1.2-5).)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3643

-- Commit Summary --

  * Exception for Retire Prior To

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (9)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3643.patch
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3643.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3643