IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK Delay and reference host-delay (#3971)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37B63A09CF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1hBpNU9ZylEr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E423A0958 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.39]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333A4340EDF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1596123604; bh=I0bpTO3EsBIPI1I5cYq9zn+Zn8NcjkDZed1FEMt23Ek=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i3e1HpFiGKy9XVlLlU75vg8A2FVhIG7jI/sqMltS/BdMEQFuHcy6DQsaQ3PTY8DO3 KQqTlVuv+UUj6OJWTsXFob9uPKUsq6+wOyuZjNu+S6A9hz0Ku9tKe7t0t6iN9gus+M grJm/6HF3FMtBGmQeIVzon7Ygo/MIRWEjY7E7Ero=
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:40:04 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4RQZT5GE5VYHMFHEF5F3FNJEVBNHHCPTRR6M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971/review/458523978@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK Delay and reference host-delay (#3971)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f22e9d423b2b_2c7a16f8155721"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dfZylk3t9WAByPNwviifjW3990I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:40:07 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.



> +: A variable-length integer representing the intentional delay in microseconds
+  between when the largest acknowledged packet, as indicated in the Largest
+  Acknowledged field, was received, and when the ACK frame was sent;
+  see {{host-delay}}.  The value of the ACK Delay field is scaled by

Agreed, I can fix the conflicts if this lands second.  I'm more concerned with getting this text correct.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971#discussion_r463089018

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status