Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timestamps in ACK frame (#774)
janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 21:34 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B30E134390 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T3TCmF-wDjpO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext2.iad.github.net [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D5913434E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:34:27 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1505856867; bh=OOJ4C+RXvIzIxLDDNiJiNYozjAD/DGc5blUhNVFuwwM=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MxvBDsnf4zRpyAKHqIRTkrV0y2dxtEhHE7fW3kQnfIP79tjwe/+iVJx+2PyOwjSxC up2TjyDhiz5PvyJSoqjs4c98Qqyf+xHpl8wnZ6YbeBiQ5Qrl6FVDj2ZoDTeR0ejUqW kOI/fndweY/2Osphgfj7jymwki5G4PH6YkJ9ETsM=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7a91166f6b1307f79b7c33fa15374fa6030840ec92cf0000000115d94f6392a169ce0f547812@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/774/330680339@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/774@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/774@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timestamps in ACK frame (#774)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59c18d631210d_28da3fb2e3b54f8499133"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dhJrJ3LYiLbRm89aDHPBXcJtrus>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:34:29 -0000
Per-packet timestamps *may* be useful, which is why it makes sense to make them negotiable. Christian lists some use cases above, and we are planning to use it the BBR congestion controller to separate forward path delay variance from reverse-path. This is useful for delay-based congestion controllers in general. Ian's point about receiving congestion control information "in sequence" instead of all at once has convinced me that having a separate frame would actually hurt, so I'm on board with having it be part of the ACK frame. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/774#issuecomment-330680339
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timestamps … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… IngJohEricsson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Negotiate use of timesta… Mark Nottingham