From nobody Tue Sep 15 07:01:49 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6624B3A0FBD for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:01:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.703 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3xEkIZVDa-R for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511CA3A0F95 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-lowworker-2ef7ba1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2ef7ba1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.16.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78859E1FE5 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1600178505; bh=oh5Nydo59xUFeh8YEhnxb+0MeDxyCB76Q5nm/kHtU9k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XrLYbVBbTiz3NuXiJYWPKFTfTUIx2J4ODOpKY9o6V4da0rE3jMwbJKqlz+YA6hBoO I930o6FWs5oVTOo4oYzNj1AooOBbAuYjvQevQSG1QJt1DWJ3US78z5EIxjm0BCYIeB 7YoBhkyuR3htnPD4LCAfsFuNk0pV7ykaA8GRYkTk= Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:01:45 -0700 From: Marten Seemann Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts To: quicwg/base-drafts Cc: Subscribed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should invalid TP result in FRAME_ENCODING_ERROR? (#4099) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f60c94969512_421d19f01988b0"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:01:47 -0000 ----==_mimepart_5f60c94969512_421d19f01988b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I always rationalized this as "the encoded content of the CRYPTO frame is erroneous". That's even more confusing. The CRYPTO frame itself is totally fine. I'd be in favor of changing it to a TRANSPORT_PARAMETER_ERROR. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4099#issuecomment-692734905 ----==_mimepart_5f60c94969512_421d19f01988b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I always rationalized this as "the encoded content of the CRYPTO frame is erroneous".

That's even more confusing. The CRYPTO frame itself is totally fine. I'd be in favor of changing it to a TRANSPORT_PARAMETER_ERROR.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

----==_mimepart_5f60c94969512_421d19f01988b0--