Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion does not cover handshake MITM (#3512)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Mon, 20 April 2020 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44263A0B1B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.143
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FULaOEqzz3wY for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F623A0AF3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cf59896.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cf59896.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.112.26]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E0BA0E50 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1587379918; bh=4+e+kdT9iAkmKDHi9c0ZObV31KLOZ+czwCiBFYrmRvc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=amkHC5MVg6Ple5j9e0wQmifCxYxlkHiYdoYg0j8jONSNyKAdPp3hJyNi3RXbeGTRI y7NCkKa88HMmXDEF1faH/zcRmDDsxIT2mCiJpssLufZ05/78RvN7hfVY4aWnW03/X6 Mf4K2k5+UIm3xdtCykDkiy0mc6MdsFg4pOQIHqaw=
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:51:58 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY2A523Z6LIUSTCIPV4VFP45EVBNHHCFCMR3U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512/616470705@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Threat model discussion does not cover handshake MITM (#3512)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e9d7ece8076_2ae33fa92aecd96c243952"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dkOWsptwjdujdC1yTzn_lxjHo4c>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:52:04 -0000

Thanks folks. It seems we have a path forward, so I'm removing the needs-discussion label. The editorial process will naturally generate some back and forth but that is the same for all editorial issues. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3512#issuecomment-616470705