Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit bursts (#3936)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 22 July 2020 00:41 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928DD3A0901 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id glkOTqnH23zJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 602A93A0900 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-c5134a3.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-c5134a3.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.55]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397396E0A6D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1595378490; bh=XM7HX8dPkw56mM0EQb8Iqf0Rzr82ddAOzipZYgqdjaE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=IpB74Yl8+yZa14P/GrDCzM+bu7HTfLrr0UpBXB3GTxf3aKcAn5h/iQgfGRnY3eHd2 2aqp3baAuyIh5EIBxuzVdVQ8UgkmXcKtfNbIJ+c+g9rFAtq12Cwex2AojU9JeX4hRb fIoS9EgicXjRbDpxcUmA42QexSlccDMVmPHnqA0U=
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:41:30 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4TSPD7VPUOTWI4DGF5ENWDVEVBNHHCPCSHKI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3936/review/452920492@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3936@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3936@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit bursts (#3936)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f178b3a281dd_78453fd5602cd95c99748"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dp6GEepc11WgYfYcw-UX3GEqKJk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:41:33 -0000
@ianswett commented on this pull request. There's one important thing we're missing here, which is if the CWND > IW, then it can be particularly critical to pace when sending the first flight after quiescence. Given we're not requiring slow start after idle, I think we need to provide some limits after idle. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3936#pullrequestreview-452920492
- [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit bursts (… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender SHOULD limit burs… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] sender MUST limit bursts… Jana Iyengar