Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types section and references (#2203)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 04:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78643130DC8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:54:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzfy7aAQ7vpI for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 983ED1276D0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:54:12 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545195252; bh=YHfdw2A1u6QNhd9VbGuU+xG1Iq0+jtkvNnH9C51toms=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=l1n81218GREzUPGZBM8UbOmE9ffy4Mmae3QcZTw0Q2glcjSVTQ7b5wtmEMK+qyuo0 tCIwFb7Zmv7GpCPtkyqfyfChErMMzZkcumjRzqwEW0YkzQJ/pWmEeVarfEKiWMFRzS lXDgD341BMKICKrYDYYhqZeVSl0wpii3cEoKwS1U=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abccfc3dee847e51b04cfab7736c770a2db3c7395092cf00000001183190f492a169ce175c9b40@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203/review/186385869@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types section and references (#2203)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c19cef44790e_23c33fbb2b4d45c43426cb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dyokgBHhDVBmXXSTOhwi43ZPUzo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:54:17 -0000
martinthomson commented on this pull request. > The following packet types are defined: | Type | Name | Section | |-----:|:------------------------------|:----------------------------| | 0x0 | Initial | {{packet-initial}} | -| 0x1 | 0-RTT Protected | {{packet-protected}} | +| 0x1 | 0-RTT Protected | {{packet-0rtt}} | I think that this is right, but counting is hard. ```suggestion | 0x1 | 0-RTT Protected | {{packet-0rtt}} | ``` > +See Sections 2.3 of {{!TLS13}} for a discussion of 0-RTT data and its +limitations. You should move the 0-RTT packet numbers section to here and remove the TODO. > @@ -3338,6 +3342,52 @@ then a packet containing a 16-bit value of 0x9b32 will be decoded as 0xa82f9b32. Example pseudo-code for packet number decoding can be found in {{sample-packet-number-decoding}}. +### Starting Packet Numbers I don't think that we need this still, but absent analysis, this can be moved under the Initial packet section. > -~~~ +~~~~~ ```suggestion ~~~ ``` > @@ -3795,119 +3819,84 @@ Handshake encryption level is discarded - and no longer retransmitted - when Handshake protection keys are discarded. -## Retry Packet {#packet-retry} - -A Retry packet uses a long packet header with a type value of 0x3. It carries -an address validation token created by the server. It is used by a server that -wishes to perform a stateless retry (see {{validate-handshake}}). +## Short Header Packet {#short-header} I'm assuming that the diff here looks terrible because it's moved text, not changed text. > +: The length of the remainder of the packet (that is, the Packet Number and + Payload fields) in bytes, encoded as a variable-length integer + ({{integer-encoding}}). + +Packet Number: + +: The packet number field is 1 to 4 bytes long. The packet number has + confidentiality protection separate from packet protection, as described in + Section 5.4 of {{QUIC-TLS}}. The length of the packet number field is encoded + in the plaintext packet number. See {{packet-encoding}} for details. + +Payload: + +: The payload of the packet. + +### Initial Packet {#packet-initial} I think that we should use h2 for this. The section is a mix of "here is a common format" and "here is a specific instance of a common format", but I think that's tolerable. We would then have something like: ``` 17. Packet Formats 17.1. Packet Number Encoding and Decoding 17.2. Long Header Packets <-- note the extra 's' 17.3. Version Negotiation Packet 17.4. Retry Packet 17.5. Extended Long Header Packets 17.6. Initial Packet 17.6.1. Abandoning Initial Packets 17.6.2. Starting Packet Numbers 17.7. 0-RTT Protected Packet <-- extra 'Packet' 17.7.1. 0-RTT Packet Numbers 17.8. Handshake Packet 17.9. Short Header Packets <-- extra 's' ``` Does that work? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203#pullrequestreview-186385869
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types secti… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types s… Martin Thomson