IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making h3 frame types varint (#2253)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 31 December 2018 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CE6127598 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:21:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DyzY378wSHyA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7611612008F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:21:50 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1546233710; bh=I0g5OnfE9oSM9F0gCUQTZM0zYzssiaCz6q0sq+h9R+Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tdL3RBHBL84vg6CMcKcrQKU3uDjbTet0+8xI3bQvekodY2HlLcGx1+60i+lyeN7zm iZutgFW7vEHL1MHOPvnPz05lYNCjaEjIkd33s3JeUWNXV/BSsnlAGbM7xzP832++vx K+C/kB87h7dkN9BOV00+zWRAlqsgyZPVom3gkugQ=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc84eda49fad2fbdba825e2bd7766d93ce458c68492cf000000011841696e92a169ce17792cde@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2253/450609463@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2253@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2253@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making h3 frame types varint (#2253)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c29a76e755d6_37fb3f817f2d45c0359215"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/e-Nw2PHe0X9YqJhEl-v8u9Pa68A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 05:21:55 -0000

That's not really relevant.  If the intent is to enable pushing of stuff in 0.5RTT, then the design wouldn't necessarily use push IDs.  It doesn't need to associate the push with a request, so it doesn't need them, it could just use a new stream type.  But I think we're well into the weeds here.  Point is that there *might* be valid uses for sending extension frames before receiving SETTINGS.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2253#issuecomment-450609463

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email