Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make RFC 6928 normative (#3245)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 03:53 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD18E120A83 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:53:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iP99_ByNLU2A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1093120935 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-f144ac1.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-f144ac1.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF8E2C0B95 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:53:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574222017; bh=bP5ksUUZFhHMdGG0j1quDb36/FEdzWnJGb/jQjEraVA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=n5fjpQXYIcA3rfuEb83w5IyrwQ1IXrStmsAzxDlCW1clv9ltaHsqUBx1hzslGshq9 9aRWtrcq8083iblcC2v4Gvo5VvBZ6DTxrtPmu6cmPM4S2TiB6Iva5+o1CpdJQE+wAX 43p5qFBXsk6Y0LXLXq+/aR3w4/O/e2kOUMgTKTC8=
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:53:37 -0800
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK347UEU4JSZKDS6PX534HVUDEVBNHHB6OU3EY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3245/555825809@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3245@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3245@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make RFC 6928 normative (#3245)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd4b8c1cc749_70e3fe767ecd9641592df"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/eAI2Gzo5VQfB76BTE7fkmR20wpY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:53:46 -0000

A down reference to an experimental RFC is not a problem. If you believe that we shouldn't be using recommendations from an experimental RFC, we should be doing IW 4.

That said, after hearing the comments at the mic today, I am now of the opinion that we don't need a *normative* reference to 6928. Having a reference to it for rationale is important, but it doesn't need to be normative.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3245#issuecomment-555825809