Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit ack_delay by max_ack_delay (#2099)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 07 December 2018 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A84130934 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:42:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GoRtlo5BStSy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:42:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6249B12D4ED for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:42:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:42:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544150541; bh=BftOqaWLRTDSQ84+dAb0CiEej2DzwQJ4fWAb9tbava0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RM9Llt03sxMUBPgcXOpgkbNYsa5VSSWlW/ts57iWTUoXAcn/T/RZk/TRGTYV6mp1V jBa4f16RGLcOi4neMsQsarTjo5UTKz48jTB01AxK/UVzK1OHAKd5Fjol7pgxQnZA7x nxPMPj7GJidxUtyncEPxRzXohvX38hA9sqD1UimY=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abfd8480c6bbf1e963b3e6bc058ef0029b1488a02e92cf000000011821a00d92a169ce1719ace6@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2099/review/182533086@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2099@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2099@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit ack_delay by max_ack_delay (#2099)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c09de0db0e0f_226b3faaab6d45bc164395"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/eDZPrAbldlfQeRc4iigOieVP9WI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:42:25 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

Thanks Jana, suggestions accepted, though I'll note one comment addresses text that was only moved, not changed.

> @@ -267,6 +267,26 @@ all subsequent ACK frames containing them could be lost. In this case, the
 loss recovery algorithm may cause spurious retransmits, but the sender will
 continue making forward progress.
 
+# Computing the RTT estimate
+
+RTT is calculated when an ACK frame arrives by computing the difference between
+the current time and the time the largest acked packet was sent.  If the
+largest acked packet is not newly acknowledged, RTT cannot be calculated.
+
+When RTT is calculated, the ack delay field from the ACK frame SHOULD be limited
+to the max_ack_delay specified by the peer.  Limiting ack_delay to max_ack_delay
+ensures a peer specifying an extremely small max_ack_delay doesn't cause more
+spurious timeouts than a peer that correctly specifies max_ack_delay. It SHOULD
+be subtracted from the RTT as long as the result is larger than the Min RTT.
+If the result is smaller than the min_rtt, the RTT should be used, but the
+ack delay field should be ignored.

This is just moving text from below, FYI

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2099#pullrequestreview-182533086