Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_ID as a frame (#2526)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Sun, 17 March 2019 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C802C130EA4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_2xg3OpRSgz for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D411277E7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:50:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1552866625; bh=38wclJ4Ui0xqE6rKs0BRD/+aLoalL1g+2oSASnHMRcY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Rrp1SL6ytxpk816XB1NWPozPVLtDIJyPuS7WGrBRrX3+XQFjCgOdmrU9626v6Oka/ pztC4SV1dQ2ZY3pp22XhdOctn2P7lSAr/qlzDipKac1IApTJkd+b1UkyvH8r7tIQTp f2g8bE1X9wgKUgRMEE67GFTSyDaVZVNSgZPDzrU8=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7d66f045e7213c15dada07b8d070340d3f5c532992cf0000000118a69f4192a169ce1926a629@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2526/473728271@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2526@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2526@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_ID as a frame (#2526)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c8edd4164540_3ab93fc3a94d45c01920380"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/eFilsDSRSuVIi6kHfEpkwf9_K-0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:50:29 -0000

> With the current text, if I receive something bogus on a push stream (after the preface) I'll have to keep the stream around (because the push stream may come out of order) waiting for a PUSH_PROMISE with that ID that may never come.

This sounds like the case @rmarx is looking at. I'd argue this is a good reason for the current design, frame processing should only take place once the PUSH_PROMISE is received. 

But I'd like to understand how framing could help avoid errors. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2526#issuecomment-473728271