Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:56:24 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4aba14dbe12c9c5f02c9c56f4df3c91c972a901b21f92cf000000011834266892a169ce177076e8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232/449235866@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should receipt of multiple promises really
 be an error? (#2232)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1c646873c67_28883fd2722d45b886eb";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/eJf8wmosLKLw-KgifJ5REK3R0EA>


----==_mimepart_5c1c646873c67_28883fd2722d45b886eb
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think that this is OK being different due to the substrate being fundamentally different (i.e., these are reliably delivered as opposed to packets which are inherently unreliable).  But I'm happy to hear other arguments.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232#issuecomment-449235866
----==_mimepart_5c1c646873c67_28883fd2722d45b886eb
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p>I think that this is OK being different due to the substrate being fundamentally different (i.e., these are reliably delivered as opposed to packets which are inherently unreliable).  But I'm happy to hear other arguments.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232#issuecomment-449235866">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkqwpVURu_DFgy_e-15J_7CLV2Inqlks5u7FvogaJpZM4ZdEMi">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq9b2raAI7gcY4b-elxOwyItx2YJVks5u7FvogaJpZM4ZdEMi.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@martinthomson in #2232: I think that this is OK being different due to the substrate being fundamentally different (i.e., these are reliably delivered as opposed to packets which are inherently unreliable).  But I'm happy to hear other arguments."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232#issuecomment-449235866"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232#issuecomment-449235866",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232#issuecomment-449235866",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5c1c646873c67_28883fd2722d45b886eb--