Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)

Martin Thomson <> Wed, 19 August 2020 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609783A0ECE for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1rDz7EvwK1qB for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC523A0EC7 for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9161D340076 for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1597877468; bh=hRMKZcfwx+BzU54sdEvgeZbmSpLn1BxoUj8KsHOFZEE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=khretEF9Ykeru5BFKE0j45K1X8AXLizfobpB5Os38Y1fFjt3urRXrfspwZKaDOEFX e26FEFvAjlOiFjm++u1WVHlAuaiQgSGVyQuRk1M7qZs4z3zRNoiuQYhTwRYaCTF++i NvluXJSfoMTUu83M7fEWhOirFd5FiiJPdJEFHlpM=
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:51:08 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4022/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3dacdc81be6_6408196412869d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:10 -0000

This is the level of support that we rely upon.  If the path does not provide ECN-CE marking, that's OK, because the congestion controller responds to loss just as well as marking.  If it doesn't have L4S support, that's not something we care about.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: