Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve HTTP draft wording: frames carry identifier values (#3689)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 27 May 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11333A0ECA for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id av2X5AAkgoBj for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847A03A0EC9 for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4652C1588 for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1590593495; bh=RfQnlksbX1M765uO6F8umQ3PwG76Aqi+YBXKQXRrdk0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=awtncyWbV3Zy4oPWm5DLrHENzHgWhZhCocdHSoPJgWhIuYV7UeXIco2vJP2a9qoDP 4S2KGWodS8cSiduQv2oRM97yZCztyldJ3CGje5/zOjFsIrd+MLtXvW+iAvVa6CDeoC YGS+H1LLi9FO4Da6tGHSaJdUPF3xwHux+bKY76W4=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:31:35 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3689/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve HTTP draft wording: frames carry identifier values (#3689)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ece87d7bd481_43fe3fbecdccd9601043cf"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:31:38 -0000

It can, but a server isn't going to retry push streams on a new connection; it's going to decide *de novo* whether to push there.  Arguably, nothing breaks if the client increases the Push ID on the server after the fact.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: