Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 1 (#4800)

afrind <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 00:25 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194183A1A35 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmMiT6gFDpZQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D863A1B5B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-6a07ff8.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.113.54]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3147C34089E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1611620718; bh=8t0EQqxCf9O8wXtlWzQHKf1pFq2RbQCTplP9ggEWXPA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Npx7fehN8+pP0jxbEFaWyJ3WfPhhRLTKaRx2ZQgnsgTPGfyBJCZ1yD3ZIzkPLP7eW sKqj06dkOgW97N94fQ52pZq3Yh3n6PCxRI/Dz7rc1t4V29PA7YX1Pnqv3bB7RF1Efk YRwZub+QOygtZcL5tmCDiVKfVeCJ/D6iT2tFVS+0=
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:18 -0800
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZIT5PGKM3AWRPTOW56DNBG5EVBNHHC6J76DQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4800/767198781@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4800@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4800@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 1 (#4800)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_600f616e2e9b7_acf1a04923d"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/erZIa5rQf7eAwFymlH8kt-ev9xo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:25:43 -0000

I'm inclined to leave this unspecified -- the simplistic FIFO model is enough to understand the algorithms, and implementers will figure out how to optimize it.  There are several highly performant, open source implementations to draw inspiration from.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4800#issuecomment-767198781