Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Attacks Against Address Migration (#2582)

erickinnear <notifications@github.com> Tue, 16 April 2019 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2D3120669 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0auOHM6l8HV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34BB120705 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:19:11 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1555431551; bh=EtQmTrSHpzvHUNOMwMH299tk9oLyazwkMlLwHOoqERI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=t6H/nTIkPWNG2JUQ2xbd1RhmjX/cPYHiwkPLBKkP/8pCH0ra+T8aDKriJuk8ZhHS+ xQibhJBVjCqIAkwlaOvv9iIAMs1DoowX5XWIOnMglfj/u7L/2wBjJ6qDJHjszmPanP 0qFLGC5zbvackfhegWmPzeXb19BAsM5CvvLR5LxQ=
From: erickinnear <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab20faf36507923bbab971b9986939cde50f4c004e92cebac332ff92a169ce19830385@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2582/483731281@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2582@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2582@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Attacks Against Address Migration (#2582)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb6007fc2590_d003f886e8d45c41489df"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/es6n-n1CxN-iX2ITr5VTVAYFdJc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:26:25 -0000

The biggest change here to what’s already in the draft is the perspective that the “old” path may not always be the desired one. 

That being said, I think we’re still pretty well covered by the existing text describing the properties that already existed around new traffic from the client triggering it to go back to where it was previously, etc. such that an attacker would find it difficult to substantially interrupt a connection. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2582#issuecomment-483731281