IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation into a dedicated method (#3681)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sat, 30 May 2020 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47573A0A0E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2020 14:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LxAaVDETtG-V for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2020 14:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F373A0A0B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2020 14:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20903A050D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2020 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1590872655; bh=xLL6Tns37OBuT2jSoYeFveWyim8QRCvUwMXqAs6cNNY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RBjXjY6hFywTrNZwP1kyUB4rUcvGRNP8B20op/nFuWrDvUOZcn2/tWXu/izoUA58e M7xitVlsmWH9k2dHARg7WrQKJO13CCeVPUt9P9eIjxPL+G5lbRQtPZVMzt3vzj8VJU EKupovwDSDLDLjEJbe9GJaS9ewyYZf7Wu0+fqAw0=
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 14:04:15 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3QPVP5EK5S77U3X25432VU7EVBNHHCKEI7XY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681/review/421443307@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Split PTO calculation into a dedicated method (#3681)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ed2ca4f10cd4_4da13fb7bf6cd96c4182ee"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ezizJgDUW0F0QSS3GJOoDxbRpMA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 21:04:18 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.



>        space = pn_space
   return time, space
 
+GetPtoTimeAndSpace():
+  duration = (smoothed_rtt + max(4 * rttvar, kGranularity))
+      * (2 ^ pto_count)
+  # Arm PTO from now when there are no inflight packets
+  if (no in-flight packets):

I added an assert that for !PeerCompletedAddressValidation().

I think the condition you're mentioning is:
"if (no in-flight packets in space):
    continue;"

That's per PN-space, not for the connection as a whole.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3681#discussion_r432886719

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email