Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove PRIORITY (#2924)

Jana Iyengar <> Mon, 12 August 2019 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A061215EC for <>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NegPmwnpTeZe for <>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E40120910 for <>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:55:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1565646903; bh=+5Z/wMi3tZsUPR7hvonKgvuVDS29QJXkV95rxCCVQCo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1YkjUp3eAw80dUUYMYyQKxO5qVGCca4EsT7Ujjq3+om8j+4ZK2V+bKNE1+wMaFaOU DAhrRN5jHMoRaSCJyEUV07FmWtasISyQVLl+5ZwN/xBR8z5iqB0dF5ujZEOjOdSh+X bPtcz2ZPi1wB+qsV2Zwo3hK10Hjv8beLjOfrAT60=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2924/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove PRIORITY (#2924)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d51e03784a88_59de3fb593acd964901693"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:43:23 -0000

I agree with @MikeBishop's assessment above. My read is that all paths forward are effectively rid of the current priority scheme. The discussion of which way to go next is likely to take some more time, but in the meanwhile, does anyone have an issue with removing the existing priority text in draft-ietf-quic-http (as #2922 does)?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: