[quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum packet size required for QUIC (#69)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sat, 03 December 2016 21:57 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0C1128E18 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8g6Ha1s96zX5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext6.iad.github.net [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34661293E1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 13:57:27 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1480802247; bh=jQIpo1+GpEW0bRYq8gH6njO1HFHSOsBqjtiQ8eBaUTY=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VaYc7NNUhpDtWR6cfE2IhV29aCSN1AI+b3w2CIjo7rG4Sfjn6yh7Z3nqmNhGoxcOl n7p6hqkyju5mPlcTNnwbZdgLvl3qlzhV6FMYx/DJTsCR71W7vyFyFBXzsFkFhcIhkA rRa/d9/fLDcGv7OTyQRbLKdLoV59BSTvZ1m25PTE=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/69@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum packet size required for QUIC (#69)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58433fc7d009f_184e3fd5dab3d130459430"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/fHy2fhahv0pkr8b3HcGqQV4I-hk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe08977deac88054027b0742c07cb87a21ea9c17792cf00000001145b01c792a169ce0b85c4b6@reply.github.com>
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:57:30 -0000
Issue #64 brought up PTUMD, which brought up the issue of minimum packet size. Stateless rejects require the CHLO to fit into one packet, so the minimum should be specified with that in mind. #64 also brought up the issue of downgrade attacks, and given the vast majority of paths permit 1200 bytes, we should be able to agree on a reasonable(ie: >1k) minimum size. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/69
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum packet s… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum pack… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify the minimum pack… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Minimum packet size (#69) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Minimum packet size (#69) Mark Nottingham