Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retransmitted frames at the end of the queue? (#2374)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 January 2019 03:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69678130F36 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:09:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaGma0K9imsf for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4040130F09 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:09:54 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548644994; bh=QTv+sr6DIoUIUTuapFTXOPds4YQaGliBkzSmKjdJjlo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=C7KyyPOaA1HYSPlCUgqG1iGUubUH8tcK8B//zrg6Stnn6PqYlIFmXXbyLE22y0LhB y/eMbIqpg7C3HEPBAXJptnCG1zDWtgoRbCOLq3801PXAfbEYsD2VImNoCxs+mUdP4D 60sI3d7UM+dp6/Vv65u3QvWaF0bqEljEnpsHoWj4=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf429d209ff649487faf8b8e17d85b3a1f95c3ff792cf000000011866348292a169ce180ef4ec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374/457986226@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retransmitted frames at the end of the queue? (#2374)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c4e7282a55e3_6f513f8a38ed45c01051059"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/fIXb51nncHIQUwcVMx9jK-lubxg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:09:57 -0000
The spec already [says](https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.html#retransmission-of-information) > Endpoints SHOULD prioritize retransmission of data over sending new data, unless priorities specified by the application indicate otherwise (see Section 2.3). It seems like Quinn is ignoring this advice. > Picoquic found that 10 seconds passed without making any progress, since no data was passed to the application, and closed the connection. I think this rule is part of the problem. If there's still data arriving, there's no need to close the connection. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374#issuecomment-457986226
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retransmit… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retran… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retran… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retran… Martin Thomson