Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC header format/demultiplexing (#426)

[ianswett <[e-mail]>]

I completely agree with your last point Martin, that we have no reserved packet types.  However, we still have some important issues to resolve, including greasing and possibly changing the packet number format, and we should resolve those before we do hacky changes, since solving those will likely cause us to do different hacky changes in the future.  Using TLS 1.3 as a model, I think we should hold off on hacky changes until towards the very end of the process.

I sent out PR #995 because draft 08 already introduced a ton of changes, this one was unnecessary at this stage, and there is a lot of discussion on this matter still, so there's no point in changing things now.  I'm happy that we're having that discussion on the list and here, so I think we'll figure out what we really need to make QUIC and WebRTC coexist.

I'd also like to be in a place where we can QUIC can coexist with other protocols fairly easily in general.  I don't have any concrete proposals yet, but UDP 443 is fairly heavily used, so it'd be nice to find a more general solution.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426#issuecomment-349793441