IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)

Nicolas Kuhn <notifications@github.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870AC120998 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:22:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nh5JoseOJo_n for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B07120A3E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.102]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC274C60596 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:22:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572898948; bh=icaH9DUauzRorUEvH4n5FYAPSiriQkMIKkzDeiMgBTU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=T4uZevadmLzR6MRcOZUAfibqqkztHon87DsWveZj+0ZFAAu7wIN0deelFAjRxaAs7 pZC2BYaOmh/0FIw6G4r/uw1E21mSUre9oIaik0mNSvxY6jah6QIstEUmItokQJmsV4 2o+twk561tsFLbo/fov2ApZZ+qe/QRXdLVot8Cqg=
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 12:22:28 -0800
From: Nicolas Kuhn <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5MJ6DJKT2ORQNE3WF3ZW5QJEVBNHHB5VOOHI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189/549530336@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc088849c96d_ce43fc210ccd96014563f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: NicoKos
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/fTGNPgDT9sSvWlEio2U2xRBRbcQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 20:22:36 -0000

+1
We have experimented the proposed solution. It helped us identify losses occuring before a satellite gateway. Operating a network involves dealing with different equipment providers proposing specific management API and with 'old' equipment with specific management API. This solution is a real helper when it comes to identify the faulty segment in a network composed of various equipment. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189#issuecomment-549530336

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email