Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)

MikkelFJ <> Thu, 17 January 2019 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A74130DE5 for <>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:45:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dd_x8ZMEYSVM for <>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDB312D4EA for <>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:45:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:45:50 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1547711150; bh=/+HbRdIH1nq23KAMSLDjtVm6DLvPMCYnh7vGI7ji7bM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DqnjYBTBdUbZiMvKzTS19Xb6SQGEsP2q4947VS8DXy0LvQrCI5lfQsjJ3CWh/H6JX kYpvwzt5E85cP/ZjhwQwH2i1GjezoToloZcFtUIlVvuCYcmxkIetmiPQUcYhuEoPdl E0iI2PwAfJ+OHfBLM+izHd3in2GEhS8zQkf5/Fok=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2299/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c4032aea7886_62d93fa5988d45b4501bb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:45:53 -0000

I don't disagree. But I'd like to add that non-canonical form should only apply to lengths, not enumerations such as frame headers or error codes, as a general principle. The latter can be inconvenient to process if not predictable and have no benefit of being written non-canonical (other than being robust against implementation mistakes).

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: