IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset during Path Migration (#1259)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 13 April 2018 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931B912D7F6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1AXyTGNxX1Yg for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3687F12D7F1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=anq0vZPtd8/RvBUyGYSx34GiNdE=; b=OTpm22PGOhAnAsfk mPzVPcHUGZ4z/zIf8zwDOxZ1OAgCW6B3/8OyC0pQAXdpK9+UN9I5LWgheTzk6sir THA4kfQnEHSFekW0fFRcKt5Yn7oFmf+Zwa9RrRBXgyPraVQhBnemEeTPpN8vqHVn e3Q9I1XweEfvt2va4uzwXGKuAxk=
Received: by filter0812p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0812p1mdw1-18099-5AD01582-3 2018-04-13 02:27:14.131763892 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id ym1Vx4ZGQRu0MzNSQ-GuqA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 02:27:14.119 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 02:27:14 +0000
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2d4a24eb6c6ffb997ee160e302beca3df68f4b2d92cf0000000116e7d78192a169ce12828e69@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1259/c381002031@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1259@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1259@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset during Path Migration (#1259)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ad01582d62_36633ff34c1e6f341182bb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3nVAUR9QuPgSpJKQ/d2zgq0TcjscoQA3dUty pMBpimntB0IZvmgEpz6lqUUmVBXRzoifj+G/ySd+tEL0CkEBV2IZKJyHaIKlsO7+/22/fndhbW/A7V RuADF970mjlWymXsqlq6SZaFc/F7ySXqYQ6SgE8189zL6GRtgPIqXYzVTiXbk0Z1aG+F6OR01l4aGz U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/fvcZUJQWGnJmUVKZZKeNrE0fuRk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 02:27:16 -0000

Based on the discussion thus far, I don't think that we should take this.  Instead, we should make it clear that whatever instances share a key for stateless reset MUST use the same connection ID space.  Otherwise we'll end up deep in all sorts of nasty DoS problems.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1259#issuecomment-381002031

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status