Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify initial UDP datagram padding (#2519)

ianswett <> Thu, 14 March 2019 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BEB131168 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TU1kRRGKrnWv for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B40131162 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:56:30 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1552528590; bh=zqrKSnXgMSDnCFUyRuD9m8KnW7a7bdf0A7J9fxUvxcY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Rd/QzDRGNLi2e5b5UOxyJrDCSk4TaAQV311eAh3kBGs+DzSVBG2/gnJI3nS9cGJdp absuxw0bRqVlpTpMrqrDJ5R72Cl5M5rRcYdK4QJtjGewIZ3p5M+pBohMgjn/bZMWn5 5YAuBgu848vjhC6X0DezK91pGFrVQWwgQjGjqse4=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2519/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify initial UDP datagram padding (#2519)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c89b4ce70b7b_66d33f94f12d45b88784e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 01:56:33 -0000


I agree this greatly incentivizes good coalescing, but otherwise I don't see any downsides.  And simple is good.

Even when suggesting the special case for ACK-only packets, it felt like a premature optimization.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: