Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed change to #1965 (#2212)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A47C130E0A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:43:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.064
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSPN7jy-uOIQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394C912D4E6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:43:24 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545277404; bh=9MGmzNp1ZJf5oRMnfkYzeAsWyiOTgsQTQWmku9aNuSA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lpmRw3+mb6HsG8YbPq7Mv1PHxWmY7/DnssLqUZ0YtXDgwOD/j07WOy+dXdS/JfjmT SYRYJ7s7W4ofheDB0eNetEZfE6zuQqvxM68XyXm0Mnt4gKjOhF4Pr9woJE+yHzWBfc H9GXdhIDXIQ5AIBpuvnIKctLUBbT5lsNy9Jmv8U4=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abab39eed9045e5385ed394fc5af2f79fb4d776ab792cf000000011832d1dc92a169ce176a63e1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2212/c448852420@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2212@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2212@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed change to #1965 (#2212)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1b0fdc30b75_10c03fbddf4d45b8605766"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/g5_xNHJABZuYY6nWOvAjYfiqOME>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 03:43:27 -0000

@ianswett : If we say SHOULD, we need to say under what conditions an implementation might depart from the SHOULD. Specifically, in this case, we need to be able to say why an implementation might not declare all lost. I couldn't think of a good enough reason to not do this, which is why I went with a MUST.

I can remove the example, but if we can't come up with an example, this isn't a problem. @martinduke : did you have a better example?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2212#issuecomment-448852420