Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define abandonment (#2674)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Wed, 08 May 2019 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DAB1200CD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIN94oxOIyD3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71A41200A4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 17:20:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557274805; bh=6ZXpWIfOsZumA1XN9ZFqb2cRT8TGlHv02gSXK595pxo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vbAPE118MUkUzaY1JMFHe8kGO0LGhwZ9bT7qNDs+CavITOiNRWogZXBz/D+TIGgnP 2VF3XNJ5+T58HausKhHf2Fa7eHDcNYQdG16FxG6U1oRyIUCY0QB01s5Y9iKFbmyvl/ 0pubp9g8B56dBCpGfxTLmQDuRf+KLCxp4KmEGHbY=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5TX22OTKBOTYPDQJF235JTLEVBNHHBUUFJGM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2674/c490300637@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2674@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2674@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define abandonment (#2674)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd220b5648b5_3f6b3f995e2cd968112142"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gQOPIBdS9LdAmsizXygJlvR0PeU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 00:20:10 -0000

I'm wondering how one could possibly misinterpret "abandoning" here. Furthermore, I don't think it's relevant for the server here if the client actually discarded the connection state, as long as it doesn't any more packets.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2674#issuecomment-490300637