Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)

[Eric Kinnear <[e-mail]>]

erickinnear approved this pull request.

Looking great! One minor wording suggestion.

> @@ -3374,9 +3374,11 @@ priorities specified by the application indicate otherwise (see
 
 Even though a sender is encouraged to assemble frames containing up-to-date
 information every time it sends a packet, it is not forbidden to retransmit
-copies of frames from lost packets.  A receiver MUST accept packets containing
-an outdated frame, such as a MAX_DATA frame carrying a smaller maximum data than
-one found in an older packet.
+copies of frames from lost packets.  A sender which retransmits copies of frames
+must deal with decreases in available payload size due to change in packet

Lowercase `must` makes me read this oddly, how about: 
```suggestion
needs to handle decreases in available payload size due to change in packet
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3424#pullrequestreview-355731577