Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add a MESSAGE frame optimized for sub-MTU payloads (#814)

ianswett <> Wed, 20 December 2017 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DF5127867 for <>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:06:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVtnHWynNlN1 for <>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241AA126CD6 for <>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:06:31 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1513778791; bh=vFL7wQHaG7hjs5JA0kJaxcqnW6vgWaPaMtiB+qaEzH4=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zg05jZHkDKsckJ7SoituQVoX12Om9xPn+OC0dZJSv+1JgDUbuHJCgSO7LXITvR/ON 9OyXtj5TgeTqNXl4ZnWO+AiSArkJ6mbT7pzFZ12KQdu5yMxKFHMmI1Bp1KTAxy5zxR VGbX+Fu0ilntpAUdI2p3NTv3hrbZYjD0ABzJ+NcE=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/814/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add a MESSAGE frame optimized for sub-MTU payloads (#814)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a3a6e6746044_44363fc055384f282060cf"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:06:33 -0000

In my opinion, no partial reliability proposals are a requirement for v1, since one can do partial reliability today, it's just suboptimal in some ways.

Note this is already tagged quicv2 :)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: