Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation (#1343)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7658F12D885 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 09:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lB-YQfZfy9_e for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 09:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5BE12D7F5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2018 09:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 09:35:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1525970148; bh=iOexdKUKIjPiX0ltxWA2KoaBj0cUyJJwnK7Dhkst91I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=hPNHXELt3Stwxox+ot+d/9n+JDJeZma+DWyQQdSeuXMQmmogZkHsteqjWq/pgJdQ0 KrrhbvxPkevsS3BrcJeMcGX8tnStWFjZMyOIvCQHiwhkrE5tmR23GqZal76wLSz9kn Qj0jeOV4vJbgFrhvS0Wy7q+m+GamFZtW+mdUv7vg=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab085f5d463cfd0060714c1ca74a91db2b4c0b576f92cf00000001170c36e492a169ce132ccea3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1343/388109352@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1343@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1343@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation (#1343)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5af474e4a9370_76182af1ec616f5838479e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/g_FVZahXVTGOFBQ7MB168EFq3V8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:35:52 -0000
Actually, while this may turn into a separate issue, I just saw that the HQ draft *already* contains this restriction, added by #1207: > When a 1-RTT QUIC connection is being used, the client MUST NOT send requests prior to receiving and processing the server’s SETTINGS frame. So that's already there, and if we find it objectionable, we should open an issue to discuss taking it out again. The Alt-Svc thing is an interesting option. It differs from our current advertisement of QUIC version, which is only a hint and a performance optimization. If that's wrong, oh well, you negotiate. This would be considered actual "hard" knowledge about the server used when encoding packets, and it's harder to recover from. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1343#issuecomment-388109352
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… afrind
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation (#1… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Static table negotiation… Mark Nottingham