IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow removal of ACK blocks that are in flight (#917)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Sun, 12 November 2017 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81A8126C0F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 23:08:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLm5okjhRjeQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 23:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD0D126B6E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 23:08:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=CcAGkuOicxBGuLB9X9vAJ0gMrO8=; b=BWKw5yqWfEM++nqV U+Mt+6DI8EY+vJw65ibUCMuZsal8F6Nb3V3j2clF5YiQHqbLrhcBQFhaWqolw48N bmC4equUqoPCXI8IZxkfbzBjGZzuLKHaTk9vFyQ6uckaduPjK9aZasSTft/UMBmc gkBjl2tpVwxEq79JArRFvmC8IGs=
Received: by filter0564p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0564p1las1-29785-5A07F37B-7 2017-11-12 07:08:43.492624597 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0001p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id ZzrmFXU9TFK7E5MTkBNEIw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 07:08:43.194 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 07:08:43 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab041c966338066fc4cd8f149843611db574f3826992cf00000001161fb57b92a169ce1048c429@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/917/343718005@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/917@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/917@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow removal of ACK blocks that are in flight (#917)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a07f37b1ac34_60fa3f8ad33ecf2c739793"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1skYOa+jBz/cT5ftlf1HV+ApJLargYBRb9HE f35c/KwrxQqzuWO0lw+Y5Mr6lSvglHWHy1xf4yResqLGVp7MCCbbPqg8j4ndn7xSTa+mYOmx97b8QU 3qnjZMZxGps6ZwWzSvgPuT5Q4yTBzqhr/ibzCqEFJn61TcwQL3Ve8ZFEXQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gfuJA3sKxvkbRCZYiAJ7s8a1MaU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 07:08:55 -0000

I think the multiple ack frames issue was closed, but there is still no clarification on how to handle a situation where ACK's will not fit into a single frame, or even MTU. Even if unlikely, implementations need guidelines. How, and when, to not ack certain packets applies here.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/917#issuecomment-343718005

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status