IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7AD131211 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 02:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbPGImlBsrMi for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 02:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA0D13118E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 02:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 02:14:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1538558084; bh=QRdzcDUxtv/dPxag/4tBfabZqN1/2N3Nr29iSL63XD8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=jnSqgo0cu3mzdmKf0rjwbmYv33se3LZoOD73uUPhXX1dXRlJehKIwMUbzJg2hiMFC xTnmZIBhJQypSTOtkUgm7bbenw15/oltb4lH0Wo2r8dA+++8iiiVH5zWLnuWIOz/Yh MGZOCHk0vatQojFrxZNtb4yyroDxkcUIMOlk961o=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe91572b8b2f835d6734930ad1780aaef36a0a5ec92cf0000000117cc4a8492a169ce15d27d33@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828/426566405@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bb488847d6e3_5c143fe2a2ad45c0361668"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gggOXU5nwWHIe1DTpm85Zh_QKOo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 09:14:47 -0000

> Different processes can connect on the same IP pair.

Or diffrent machines when a NAT or a L4 load balancer is present.

Anyways, I assume that we agree that the identifier needs to be the 5-tuple (setting aside what “path” means).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1828#issuecomment-426566405

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email